Legal Opinion

Sturtz v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1983No. 309 Misc. Dkt. No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam Opinion,

Petitioner Richard Sturtz, a parole violator reincarcerated pursuant to conviction of an offense committed while on parole, has filed a petition for review of the actions of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole in connection with the revocation of his parole and recomputation of his sentences.

The petition for review presents two issues which we have recently considered in other cases:

First, where a parole violator, ultimately convicted for an offense committed while on parole, does *73not obtain release on bail pending trial but remains in detention, should the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Mitchell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Brown v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Rivera v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Jones v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Hardy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API