United States v. Kane
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff in action to recover on policy of war risk insurance. The action was instituted by Sam B. Kane, the insured. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case the government moved for a nonsuit, on the ground that the plaintiff had not made out a prima facie case and that there was m> substantial evidence of total and permanent disability during the life of the *397policy. The motion was denied. After both sides had rested the government moved for a directed verdict on1 the same grounds as the prior motion, and the same ruling had. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. SlighCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. EliassonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- United States v. RasarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Acosta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- Sloan v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1937
- United States v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936