Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Union Traction Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Kephart:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by quo warranto proceedings, is endeavoring to forfeit the charters of a number of so-called underliers of the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company, commonly known as P. R. T. The object it hopes to obtain by this proceeding, as stated at the argument, is to force a reduction in the rentals paid by P. R. T., a reduction in fare to the car riders, and a more advantageous basis for the city to receive adequate return for the use of its subways.
The reasons assigned by the State appear from the suggestion filed for the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kirk v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.