Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Marshall v. Butler County

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 29, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtValliant, J.

— This is an original mandamus suit, in which the relators seek to require the defendants, who are Butler county and the judges of the county court, to pay, out of the proceeds of swamp and overflowed lands now in its treasury, a judgment rendered against the county on account of its liability under a contract made with relatora in its capacity as trustee of those lands.

The record shows that title to a large quantity of such lands had, under an act of the General Assembly in 1868, passed to the county in trust for school purposes, and that in 1895, through causes which it would be useless now…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kersey v. GartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Moyer v. CantienySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. McElhinney v. KlineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Reynolds v. Clark CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Reynolds Land Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. McCall v. AtchleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Lyle v. AndalaftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API