Legal Opinion

State v. Bourn

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 8, 1980No. 221-79PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBillings, J.

The defendant was charged and convicted below for sexual assault. 18 V.S.A. § 8252(1) (A). On appeal his sole claim of error is that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court refused to instruct the jury on the elements of simple assault under 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1). The thrust of the defendant’s argument is that simple assault is a lesser included offense of sexual assault.

In order for a defendant to be entitled to jury instructions on a lesser offense than that for which he is charged, the elements of the lesser offense must necessarily be included within the greater offense. See…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. GregaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. State v. ForbesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. State v. MessierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API