State v. Petrone

Diane Petrone (Diane) appeals from a judgment convicting her of perjury, 1 contrary to sec. 946.31(l)(c), Stats., and imposing as a con dition of probation that she not work as a nude dancer. Diane was accused of falsely testifying at a John Doe proceeding that she, and not her husband, Jerry Petrone (Jerry), took nude photographs of herself and other females. On appeal, Diane raises three issues: (1) whether the evidence adduced at trial is sufficient to support the conviction; (2) whether the judge presiding over the John Doe proceeding was properly appointed as a reserve judge; and (3)…