Legal Opinion · Dissent

Connelly v. Gaffaney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1932No. 19783Published

1DissentSwindall, J.

I cannot agree with the majority, opinion. I have no fault to find with the syllabus in the majority opinion, but do not feel that the same covers the issues presented by the pleadings and disclosed by the evidence in the case. As stated in the majority opinion, Alexander Connelly was a Sac & Fox Indian past 80 years of age, and the defendants Grace Gaffaney, Charles T. Conne'ly, Edgar Connelly, and Theresa Alvira Connelly are children of plaintiff by his second marriage. Floyd G. Hubbell was the notary public acknowledging the deed of Alexander Connelly involved in this action. O. T. Hubbell…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Hobbs v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Saylor v. CrookerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Rozell v. VansyckleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lee v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API