Johnson v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, Presiding Judge.
It will be noted that the plaintiff sues on the notes here involved as a bona fide holder for value before maturity. Defendant contends that the plaintiff is not a bona fide holder for value before maturity and, therefore, is not entitled to recover.
The agreement between the defendant (insured and maker) and the Morgan & Morgan Insurance Agency (payee and indorser) is set forth in the face of each of the "conditional acceptance premium notes” sued on.
This agreement provides expressly and by necessary implication the following: (a) The notes are “tendered” to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Walker v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Ramspeck v. PattilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Napier v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Sessions v. Payne & TyeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Johnson v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958