La Bonty v. Lundgren
Nebraska Supreme Court
cited, as to the instruction: State v. Stout, 31 Mo., 406; State v. Cushing, 29 Id., 215; State v. Mc-Davitt, 69 la., 549. cited on the same point: Sackett, Instructions [2d Ed.], sec. 3; Green v. Janey, 4 Com. Law, 524; Rudolph v. Lane, 57 Ind., 115; Bierbach v. Goodyear, 54 Wis., 208.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action of ejectment to recover the possession of 160 acres of land in Cuming county, arid for the rents and profits thereof for four years. The answer is a general denial and an estoppel in pais. On the trial of the cause the jury found generally in favor of the defendant, and also specially as to certain facts submitted to them. A motion for a new trial was thereupon filed and overruled and judgment entered on the verdict.
The testimony shows that the land in controversy was entered by one Charles Bartholomew, the patent being is*420sued November 2, 1868. Bartholomew conveyed to the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BartleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- La Bonty v. LundgrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Kemp v. SlocumNebraska Supreme Court · 1907