Legal Opinion

Scarboro v. Edenfield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1938No. 26960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. In a proceeding before the ordinary under the Code, § 83-119, for removal of an obstruction from a private way, a prescriptive right to use which the applicant claims to have acquired under § 85-1401, it is necessary, in order to sustain such application, to show not only that he has been in uninterrupted use thereof for seven years or more, that it does not exceed fifteen feet in width, and that it is the same number of feet originally appropriated, but that he has kept it open and in repair during such period. Collier v. Farr, 81 Ga. 749 (7 S. E. 860); Nashville Chattanooga & St. Louis…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Collier v. FarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Fisher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Johnson v. SamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. CoatsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Elliott v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Burnum v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Roach v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Wilson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  5. Revocable Trust of Griffin v. Timberlands Holding Co. Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API