Legal Opinion

Cranetex, Inc. v. Mountain Development Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1987No. 16863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

Defendant-appellant Mountain Development Corporation (MDC) entered into two lease-option-to-purchase contracts with Petro-Lift. Petro-Lift is not a party to this appeal. The first lease involved an eighteen-ton crane, and the lease expired on March 1, 1985. The second lease involved a twenty-ton crane, and that lease expired on March 15, 1985.

The terms and conditions of the option to purchase were primarily oral agreements; however, Cranetex stipulated, and the trial court found that the language contained in Schedule A of the two leases constituted an option to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newberry v. McClarenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Dave Williams Printing Co. v. WootenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LANB v. UrbanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Molinar v. Larry Reetz Constr., Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API