Legal Opinion
Ross v. Schackel
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 1996No. 930629Published
1Opinion of the Court
920 P.2d 1159 (1996)
Albert L. ROSS, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Greg M. SCHACKEL, M.D., Defendant and Appellant.
No. 930629.
Supreme Court of Utah.
July 12, 1996.
Ross C. Anderson, Nathan B. Wilcox, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.
Jan Graham, Att'y Gen., Elizabeth King, Carol Clawson, Asst. Att'ys Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant.
HOWE, Justice:
Plaintiff Albert L. Ross, a prison inmate, brought this negligence action against defendant Greg M. Schackel, a physician employed by the Utah State Prison. The district court denied Schackel's motion for summary judgment, and we granted his petition for…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Doe v. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.