Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Morera

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris E. Speotor, J.

Motion to stay arbitration is denied. Subdivision 2-a of section 167 of the Insurance Law requires that all policies must insure against loss by “ an insured motor vehicle where the insurer disclaims liability or denies coverage There is no requirement that the disclaimer be a valid one.

Although setting up a statutory scheme for recovery by a “ qualified person ” (Insurance Law, art. 17-A), a person who is covered by a policy of insurance issued pursuant to section 167 recovers under the policy terms as set forth in that section. The Legislature did not intend to limit an “ insured ” to the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & HolleyNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & CurtisNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API