Legal Opinion · Dissent

Worthington v. Bynum

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 1981No. 803SC1021Published

1Dissent

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge,

dissenting.

In his order granting defendant’s post-trial motions by setting aside the verdicts and granting defendants new trials on the *420issues of damages, Judge Peel recited the grounds for defendants’ motions as follows:(1) That there was a manifest disregard by the jury of the instructions of the Court,(2) Excessive damages appearing to have been given in each case under the influence of passion or prejudice, and(3) The insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict in each case and that said verdict in each case is contrary to law.

While a trial court is not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Tanglewood Land Co., Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. GLEN FOREST CORPORATION v. BenschCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Hoover v. KLEER-PAK OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API