Moore v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
The State failed to identify the tracks as those of the defendant. See Patton v. State, 117 Ga. 230 (43 S. E. 533) and Cummings v. State, 110 Ga. 293 (35 S. E. 117). In our opinion the evidence, wholly circumstantial, did not negative every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. See Corbin v. State, 84 Ga. App. 763 (67 S. E. 2d 478). See also Wilson v. State, 32 Ga. App. 427 (123 S. E. 623); Kinsey v. State, 40 Ga. App. 707 (151 S. E. 394) and Ralston v. State, 66 Ga. App. 62 (17 S. E. 2d 81).
The trial court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Kinsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Browner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Griffith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971