Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ramcharan v. Angelo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 1978Published

1Dissent

Mollen, P. J., and Hopkins, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant plaintiffs’ motion, with the following memorandum:

We find that there is no basis upon which the plaintiffs could be held to have been contributorily negligent, that the record affirmatively establishes that no factual issues exist with regard to the defendant Angelo’s actions and that liability is clearly and unequivocally indicated. Consequently, we conclude that a trial is not required to resolve the issue of liability. On August 18, 1976, three days after the accident, the defendant Angelo signed a Department…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Opalek v. OshrainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API