Legal Opinion

Peters v. Adam

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Two applications by Edward D. Peters for mandamus—the first against Robert B. Adam and others, constituting the civil service commission of Buffalo, to compel certification of pay rolls; the second against the same defendants, and in addition James N. Adam, mayor of Buffalo, and Charles F. Milliken and others, constituting the state civil service commission. Writs allowed.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.

The applicant, Edward D. Peters, chief clerk in the bureau of engineering, department of public works, of the city of Buffalo, brings two mandamus proceedings. The first is to compel the Buffalo civil service commission to certify certain of his pay rolls, which they have refused to certify, basing his claim upon the ground that he was lawfully transferred from the position of chief bookkeeper in the comptroller’s office, in the exempt class, to that of chief clerk of the bureau of engineering, in the competitive class, and having passed the first competitive examination ever held for that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Schau v. . McWilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Dill v. WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. People ex rel. Coit v. WheelerNew York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Peters v. AdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API