Legal Opinion

Hull v. Phillips

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. Ghesley A. Mosmxm, Judge. (1) The motion of the respondent is unauthorized by the law and states no ground for the relief sought, and the judgment thereunder is void and of no effect. Laws of Missouri, 1903, p. 74, amending section 5665, R. S. 1899; R. S. 1899, sec. 5666-5680; Bicldey v. Railroad, 68 Mo. App. 496; Stewart v. White, 98 Mo. 226; Nielder v. Holmes, 58 M'o.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. Ghesley A. Mosmxm, Judge. (1) The motion of the respondent is unauthorized by the law and states no ground for the relief sought, and the judgment thereunder is void and of no effect. Laws of Missouri, 1903, p. 74, amending section 5665, R. S. 1899; R. S. 1899, sec. 5666-5680; Bicldey v. Railroad, 68 Mo. App. 496; Stewart v. White, 98 Mo. 226; Nielder v. Holmes, 58 M'o. App. 119; Hilton v. St. Louis, 99 Mo. 208; St. Louis v. Meier, 8 Mo. App. 579. (2) Respondent has no claim'against the city of St. Joseph. To entitle a person to be made a party to a…

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

In November, 1905,’the city of St. Joseph duly directed the grading of King Hill Avenue, in said city. Under the provisions of law a copy of the ordinance was filed in the Buchanan Circuit Court for proceedings in pursuance of law. At this time defendant was the owner of real property along such avenue which was affected by such proposed grading. On September 3, 1906, the circuit court appointed commissioners to assess damages and benefits to property. *250On the next day, before a meeting had by the commissioners, the defendant conveyed the property by warranty deed to the plaintiff. Pour days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skinker v. HaagsmaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Whyte v. City of KansasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Kiebler v. HolmesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Seventeenth Street v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Security Co. v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Brick v. CazauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Passer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Mohesky v. City of WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Passer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API