Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gary C'hair and Rochelle C'hair v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District, State of Wyoming, and John Strohecker

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2015No. S-14-0198Published

1DissentBurke, Chief Justice

[T74] I respectfully dissent. I would conclude that a Wyoming district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a tort action brought by a non-Indian plaintiff against enrolled tribal member defendants' to recover damages for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision that occurred' on a state highway within the boundaries of the Wind River Reservation. Consequently, I would reverse the decision of the district court.

[T75]) My prmcipalavdepamure from the majority's analysis arises from its conclusion that the status of the tribal member as a defendant is irrelevant. According to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Strate v. A-1 ContractorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API