Legal Opinion

Lydia v. Horton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 14, 2003No. 25675Published

1Opinion of the Court

355 S.C. 36 (2003)

583 S.E.2d 750

Mitchell LYDIA, Respondent,

v.

Steve C. HORTON, Petitioner.

Lisa Mullinax Lydia, Respondent,

v.

Steve C. Horton, Petitioner.

No. 25675.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard December 4, 2002.

Decided July 14, 2003.

Samuel W. Outten, John Patrick Riordan, both of Leatherwood Walker Todd & Mann, of Greenville, for Petitioner.

Andrew C. Barr, of Fulton & Barr, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Chief Justice TOAL.

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' determination that Petitioner is liable on a first party negligent entrustment claim because he allowed an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mary Ann Waynick v. Chicago's Last Department Store, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. Nelson v. Concrete Supply CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Christiansen v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API