Hill v. Van Duzer
Supreme Court of Georgia
Certiorari. Before Judge Reese. . Elbert superior court. September term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.
1. The points soughtto be made as to alleged error in admitting testimony were not properly presented.
2. Mere agency to collect a particular claim does not authorize the agent to agree that the proceeds thereof shall be applied to a debt due by his principal.
3. Neither a widow nor her agent, whatever his authority, can lawfully apply the proceeds of a year’s support set apart for the benefit of herself and minor children to the payment of a pre-existing debt due by her individually, in the consideration of which the minors had no interest.
4. Applying the principles laid down in the two…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Anders v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Simpson v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Gibbs v. LandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Lunsford v. KerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Phillips v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.