State v. Grim
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
We are asked to determine whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction' to accept appellant’s guilty plea when the indictment was not stamped “true bill.” We remand for a hearing to determine whether the indictment was true billed.
FACTS
Appellant Marcus Antonio Grim pled guilty to charges of murder, armed robbery, criminal conspiracy, possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime, and pointing a firearm. He was sentenced to thirty years for the murder, with all the other sentences to run concurrently. The day after his plea, defense counsel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- State v. BultronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- State v. BeachumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Pringle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. SmallsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001