Legal Opinion

State v. Grim

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 2000No. 25144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

We are asked to determine whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction' to accept appellant’s guilty plea when the indictment was not stamped “true bill.” We remand for a hearing to determine whether the indictment was true billed.

FACTS

Appellant Marcus Antonio Grim pled guilty to charges of murder, armed robbery, criminal conspiracy, possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime, and pointing a firearm. He was sentenced to thirty years for the murder, with all the other sentences to run concurrently. The day after his plea, defense counsel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. BultronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. BeachumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Pringle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. SmallsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API