Legal Opinion

Nelson v. City of Waukesha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha eounty: Maetin L. Lueck, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.

This is a suit in equity by the owner of real estate abutting on the street, against the city alone, for a decree declaring void a special assessment for street paving and to enjoin the city, its officials, servants, and employees, (1) from issuing any certificate of benefits against the plaintiff’s real property; (2) from issuing any bonds on any such certificates; (3) from levying any taxes to pay for such *164certificates or bonds; (4) from enforcing tbe collection of such taxes. The legal conclusion that no valid or legal assessment of benefits or damages was made is followed by aver-ments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Newton v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Heath v. HeathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Hardy v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bekkedal v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Connell v. City of KaukaunaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API