Legal Opinion

Quarles v. City of Appleton

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 30, 1924No. Nos. 3216, 3217PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvan A. Evans, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Upon the record before us it is apparent that review of this judgment must be by a writ of error. The action which culminated in the judgment was one at law, not a suit in equity. It is true the original proceedings were equitable in character, but the receiver appointed in the equity suit sought and obtained leave from the court to bring this .action at law to recover a money judgment upon an alleged contract. It follows that, to review such a judgment, a writ of error is necessary. Ana Maria Co. v. Quinones, 254 U. S. 245, 41 Sup. Ct. 110, 65 L. Ed. 246;…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sebastian Bridge Dist. v. HedrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Muentzer v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  3. City of Milwaukee v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Keystone Steel & Wire Co. v. Kokomo Steel & Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  5. City of Williston v. LudoweseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API