Legal Opinion

Goyen v. City of Troy

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1996No. 95-491PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erdmann

This is an appeal from an order of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, denying Will and Bonnie Goyens’petition and quashing their application for alternative writs of mandamus and prohibition. We affirm.

The dispositive issues are as follows:

1. Did the District Court err in concluding there was no violation of the open meeting law in regard to the May 10, 1995, meeting?

*2162. Did the District Court err in concluding there was no violation of the open meeting law in regard to the August 16, 1995, hearing?

3. Did the District Court err in quashing the writs of mandamus and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana Human Rights Division v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Missoulian v. Board of Regents of Higher EducationMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bozeman Daily Chronicle v. City of Bozeman Police DepartmentMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Common Cause v. Statutory Committee to Nominate Candidates for Commissioner of Political PracticesMontana Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kohfeld v. United Pacific Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. EBI/Orion Group v. BlytheMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stenstrom v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Raap v. Wolf Point School Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Hern Farms, Inc. v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API