Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

C.P. v. M.K.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 11, 1994No. AV92000523Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

THIGPEN, Judge,

specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur that the record does not support a finding that the mother is unfit, and, therefore, that finding must be reversed; however, I do not agree that the trial court is now required to enter a judgment granting custody to the mother. Although I concurred in the remand of the original case, upon closely revisiting this case, I am now convinced that no finding regarding fitness is required.

Although the original opinion characterized the case as one involving “a custody dispute between nonparents and a parent,” the reasoning…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. DALE CTY. DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC. v. RoblesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Matter of YoungCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Sanders v. GuthrieCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API