C.P. v. M.K.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
THIGPEN, Judge,
specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur that the record does not support a finding that the mother is unfit, and, therefore, that finding must be reversed; however, I do not agree that the trial court is now required to enter a judgment granting custody to the mother. Although I concurred in the remand of the original case, upon closely revisiting this case, I am now convinced that no finding regarding fitness is required.
Although the original opinion characterized the case as one involving “a custody dispute between nonparents and a parent,” the reasoning…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- DALE CTY. DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC. v. RoblesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Matter of YoungCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Sanders v. GuthrieCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.