Legal Opinion

Haberman v. Greenspan

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1975PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVito J. Titone, J.

In these two real property actions tried jointly by the court, plaintiffs, Donald P. Ericksen and his wife, Rita Ericksen, and plaintiffs, Philip Haberman and his wife, Lenora Haberman, originally sought rescission in connection with their purchase of a duplex, 34-36 Fieldway Avenue, Staten Island, New York. Subsequently they withdrew their claims for rescission but continued their suits for damages.

The thrust of the plaintiffs’ claims is that the corporate defendant and the individual defendants breached the contracts of sale by constructing the foundation of the duplex on piles that were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rapid Transit Subway Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Moser v. SpizzirroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Baron v. Bobroy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Daniel I. Colton, United States of America v. Daniel I. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Stambovsky v. AckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. London v. CourduffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API