Legal Opinion
De Hanas v. Cortez-King Brand Mines Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1928No. 7951PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Ruth B. De Hanas and Jesse L. De Hanas, filed their bill in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against Cortez-King Brand Mines Company, a Delaware corporation, H. B. Church, Jr., a citizen of Missouri, former board of directors of Union Zinc Company, a defunct Oklahoma corporation, consisting of J. C. Parrish, a citizen of Missouri, W. L. McWilliams, a citizen of Oklahoma, Wm. T. Nardin, a citizen of Missouri, L. C. Church, a citizen of Oregon, F. S. Seagrave, a citizen of Illinois, Bull Frog Mining Company, an Oklahoma…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Greeley v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Franz v. BuderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- LOUIS. & NASH. RR v. West. Un. Tel. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Kentucky Coal Lands Co. v. Mineral Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thomson v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- American Surety Co. v. Edwards & Bradford Lumber Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1944
- Leitch v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- Sudduth Bros. v. Kyanite Mining Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
- A. E. Borden Co. v. WurmDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.