United States v. Eugene James Allegrucci
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, defendant was found guilty and sentenced for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 1 upon an indictment which charged him with possession of stolen goods, moving in interstate commerce, knowing them to have been stolen. He prosecutes this appeal from the District Court’s judgment of conviction, entered following its denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal or for a new trial, 2 on these grounds: the indictment did not state a cause of action; there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict; the District Court erred in its instructions…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Thomas Eugene Barfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Alfred ManuszakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- State v. DiRienzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- United States v. George Lefkowitz, Joseph P. Dryja, Richard EmondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- State v. HumphreysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- United States v. Leo Zarattini and Anthony ZielinskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.