Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ogletree v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 7, 2009No. A09A0929Published

1ConcurrenceBernes, Judge

While I concur fully in the majority opinion and judgment, I write separately to emphasize the legal framework applicable in double jeopardy cases where the prior case ended in a mistrial due to the unavailability of a critical state witness.

It is true that under certain circumstances, the unavailability of a critical state witness can create a manifest necessity which will allow a mistrial without prohibiting retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause. See Wade v. Hunter, 336 U. S. 684 (69 SC 834, 93 LE 974) (1949); Spearman v. State, 278 Ga. 327, 329 (1) (602 SE2d 568) (2004); Humphrey v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Laster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Spearman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API