Russ v. City of Camden
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lyle Brown, Justice.
Appellant Isiah Russ was convicted by a jury of possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale without a license. The only point for reversal which we deem necessary to discuss — and in fact the only point considered to have merit — is the allegation that error was committed by the State in not producing an alleged search warrant at the trial.
For their search of the home and premises of appellant, the officers said they relied on a search warrant. The officers testified that the original warrant was handed to appellant, that he read it and handed it back to the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Lunsford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Schneider v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- State v. PrueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.