Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 1985No. C4-85-733PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Appellant Celia Scott was convicted of attempted murder in the first degree and two counts of aggravated robbery. She claims that the evidence was insufficient to sustain her convictions, that one count of aggravated robbery must be vacated, and that her conviction and/or sentence was *104unjustifiably disparate because a co-defendant was convicted of a lesser offense of attempted murder in the second degree. We affirm but vacate one of the aggravated robbery convictions.

FACTS

On September 17, 1984, Richard Emerson, Jr. and his supervisor Howard Minnick were in St. Paul on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. VazquezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StarnesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API