Legal Opinion
Slali v. Ruiz (In Re Slali)
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 17, 2002No. CV 01-04061 RSWL, CV 01-05175 RSWL, CV 01-04062 RSWL, CV 01-05176 RSWL. Bankruptcy Nos. SV 98-17925 GM, SV 98-17924 GMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. INTRODUCTION
LEW, District Judge.
This appeal arises from two chapter 7 cases, In re Manuel D. Slali and In re Steven W. Applegate, which have been consolidated for purposes of this appeal. Debtors Manuel Slab (“Slab”) and Steven Applegate (“Applegate”) appeal the Bankruptcy Court’s decision to reopen their cases in order to modify the discharge injunction. The bankruptcy court modified the discharge injunction to allow a creditor, Adrian Ruiz (“Ruiz”) to pursue his claim for worker’s compensation benefits against Slali and Applegate before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”).…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Robert Hawxhurst v. Pettibone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In Re Ralph L. WALKER, Debtor. Ralph L. WALKER, Appellee, v. Robert WILDE, Monty Higley and Jonnie Higley, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Watson v. Shandell (In Re Watson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Karen Lee Camilli, Debtor. Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Karen Lee CamilliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ruvacalba v. Munoz (In Re Munoz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In Re PattersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Ruvacalba v. Munoz (In Re Munoz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002