Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 27, 1991No. 1 Div. 54PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1011ON RETURN TO REMAND

BOWEN, Judge.

On remand, the circuit court entered an order denying the petition for post-conviction relief on the ground that “[t]he matter is one which is inappropriate for relief because it does not comply with Rule 32.6(a) of the Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure.” R. 9. The case action summary submitted on return to remand does not indicate that an evidentiary hearing was held.

Our review of the record shows that the petition was not accompanied by any filing fee and that the petitioner requested to prosecute the petition in forma pauperis. However, the petition was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Leverett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API