Legal Opinion

Stroud v. M. M. Barksdale Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 26, 1958No. 5-1576PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

The question for decision is whether the complaint and amended complaint filed in the trial court stated a cause of action.

On June 6, 1957 appellee, M. M. Barksdale Lumber Company, filed a complaint against “Stroud Brothers Lumber Company, Inc.” in which it was alleged appellee sold to the said defendant a “lot of lumber for the price of” $1,382.43; that the amount was due, and; that demand for payment had been made and refused. The prayer was for payment in said amount. The complaint was verified. Also attached thereto, marked “Exhibit A,” was a verified and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Randolph v. NicholSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Beavers v. BaucumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  3. Mason v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. H. Rouw Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Teal v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Beam v. Monsanto Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Jones v. CapersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Shopfner v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API