Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1985No. KA 2333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REDMANN, Chief Judge.

After the trial court denied his oral motion to quash, defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of theft of over $500, reserving under State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), his right to appeal the ruling on the motion to quash.

Petitioner’s successor appointed counsel describes the basis of the motion to quash thus: “[D]efendant was accused of a scheme to defraud, and of the $590, only $240 was paid to the defendant in Orleans parish. As [La.R.S. 13:67] makes a distinction between felony thefts under $500 and felony thefts over $500, the defendant considered himself…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API