Haynes v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.
MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, KEASLER and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.
The issue in this case is whether an appellate court may l’eform a trial court’s judgment to reflect a conviction for an unrequested lesser-included offense not submitted to the jury, when the appellate court decides that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict for the greater offense but is sufficient to support a conviction for the lesser-included offense. We decide that, under these circumstances, an appellate court may not reform the trial court’s judgment to reflect a conviction for the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Wheatfall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by107 opinions
- Thornton, GregoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Ervin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Unkart, Rodney GaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Grey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.