Legal Opinion

Lukacs v. Kluessner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1972No. 3-572A6PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, C.J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment.

Plaintiff-appellant, Louis J. Lukács, filed his amended complaint for personal injuries against defendant-appellee, William J. Kluessner, which, in summary, alleged that plaintiff was injured as a result of the negligence of the defendant in the operation of defendant’s automobile. Defendant-Kluessner filed his answer to the amended complaint denying, inter alia, the allegations of negligence contained therein. PlaintiffLukacs then filed a motion for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayhew, Huston v. DEISTERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Sprague v. VogtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Tobin v. McClellanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Citizens Loan Trust Co., Exr. v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Nichols v. YaterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State, Ind. State Highway Com'n v. SpeidelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Middelkamp v. HanewichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Enderle v. SharmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Freson v. CombsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. DeLeon v. SlearCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API