Legal Opinion

Campbell v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 25, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2012-1769Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JENNIFER B. CAMPBELL, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action No.: 12-1769 (RC) v. : : Re Document No.: 83 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW I. INTRODUCTION After a five-day trial, a jury found that, in the process of terminating Plaintiff Dr. Jennifer Campbell’s employment, Defendant District of Columbia denied her the procedural due process that it owed her under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. The Court entered judgment against the District in the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API