Whitney v. Faulkner
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:
¶ 1 Defendant Larry Faulkner (“Faulkner”) and his wife, Renee Faulkner (“Renee”), a garnishee, appeal the trial court’s determination that Faulkner’s disclaimer of an interest in a trust was ineffective and that the interest was therefore subject to garnishment. The plaintiffs, David C. Whitney, Whitney Enterprises, Inc., and Con-Blast, Inc. (collectively, “Whitney”), who have an unsatisfied judgment against Faulkner, cross-appeal the trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest on the garnishment amount. We affirm the trial court’s ruling regarding the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Board of Education of the Granite School District v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Exxonmobil Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Estate of KirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Thompson v. Catlin Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Crowley v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Colonial Building Supply, LLC v. Construction Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.