Legal Opinion

Hudson v. The Iodine

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1895No. 79PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was a libel by Joshua H. Hudson, master of the tug S. A. McCaulley, against the bark Iodine, to recover for services rendered.

1Opinion of the Court

BUTLER, District Judge.

This case arises out of the , facts stated in the suit by Neal v. The Elena G., 61 Fed. 519. A repetition of the statement made in that case is unnecessary.

It is not denied that the libelant rendered salvage services, and should be compensated accordingly.

The only dispute respects the amount justly due. After full consideration of all the circumstances I believe the payment of §1,000 will be a fair compensation. The Iodine and the bark Munch were lying side by side, and were removed together. For the services to the latter §500 were tendered and received.

The former is a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neal v. The Elena G.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pelton v. American Auto Heater Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API