Legal Opinion
Orellana v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2016PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*624OPINION OF THE COURT
Manuel J. Mendez, J.
It is ordered that plaintiff’s motion is granted to the extent of permitting service of an amended complaint and preliminarily enjoining Macy’s from demanding payment of civil penalties from individuals suspected of shoplifting while they are in Macy’s custody.
Plaintiff Cinthia Carolina Reyes Orellana filed a supplemental summons and class action complaint on November 12, 2015, asserting causes of action against defendant Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc., doing business as Macy’s, formerly known as Macy’s East, also known as Macy’s, Inc., for: (1) false…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Doe v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. HormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Jacques v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pena v. Macy's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024