Rehm v. Frank
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 213, Oct. T., 1900, by-defendant, from order of O. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1884, No. 91, discharging rule to open judgment in case of J. F. Rehm, administrator d. b. n. of George Rehm, deceased, v. John Frank. Before Rice, P. J., Rule to open judgment. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule to opén judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
On March 17, 1884, upon the application of the administratrix of George Rehm, the court entered judgment against the defendant upon a promissory note, with confession dated January 1, 1874. The application was accompanied by an affidavit of the administratrix that the whole amount of the note with interest, less the amount of three payments of interest, the dates *177of which were given, was due and unpaid. The court in its order directed that the credits specified in the affidavit be noted. Thereafter the defendant made payments from time to time, all of which were credited…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Eaton v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Spiess v. MooneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Brungart v. ButlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Hirschlan v. KrechmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.