Legal Opinion

In re Adderall XR (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine) Marketing, Sales Practices & Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 6, 2013No. MDL No. 2453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania action moves to centralize this litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. This litigation currently consists of three actions pending in the Central District of California, the Southern District of Florida, and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, as listed on Schedule A.1

Plaintiffs in all three actions, as well as in the recently-noticed related actions, support centralization in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Defendants Shire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  2. In re Fresh Dairy Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  3. In re Trans Union LLC Fair Credit Reporting ActUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Signal International LLC Human Trafficking LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  2. In re Testofen Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API