Legal Opinion

Howard v. Lamaster

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to quash bill of exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This is a motion to quash a bill of exceptions upon the ground that the bill was not submitted to the adverse party for examination and amendment before it was signed by the judge. There is no receipt or other evidence in the record tending to show that the bill was ever submitted to the defendant in error, or his attorneys, and Mr. Ricketts has filed an affidavit denying specifically that such bill was ever submitted to him or the defendant. To offset this, one of the plaintiff’s attorneys has filed an affidavit, wherein he denies the truth of that of the attorney for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Uhling v. SchellenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lancaster County Bank v. GililianNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rhodes v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API