Legal Opinion

Keel v. Kelly

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act instituted by an ex parte order to show cause to stay the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles from enforcing a revocation order which revoked petitioner’s driver’s license, and a suspension order which suspended petitioner’s registration. An ex parte order to show cause also temporarily stayed the commissioner from enforcing the aforesaid revocation and suspension orders, pending the hearing of petitioner’s application for the relief herein sought.

On January 26, 1955, the petitioner was convicted in Police Court, Village of Herkimer,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rigas v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Gross v. MacduffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Dixon v. TalericoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Marty v. MartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. In re FarrellNew York Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API