Legal Opinion

United States v. Braverman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1963No. 506PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Appellee, Jerry Braverman, was transportation manager of the Burbank, California, distribution office of the Andrew Jergens Company, which ships goods in interstate commerce. In June 1962 he was indicted in a United States District Court and charged with having violated § 1 of the Elkins Act 1 by having knowingly solicited from a freight forwarder concessions and rebates respecting interstate motor carrier shipments of Jergens’ goods so that, had the rebates been granted, goods would'have been shipped at a lower rate than that named in the applicable tariffs filed with the Interstate Commerce…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RaynorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. ResnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. Delaware, L. & W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  5. Howitt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. West v. KeveCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. David H. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Entertainment Ventures, Inc. v. BrewerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969
  4. United States v. LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  5. Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway, and the Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company, Intervenors, Burlington Northern Inc. And Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenors, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, Intervenor. Aliquippa and Southern Railroad Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API