Mullins v. City of River Rouge
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
This cause was tried to this court, jury trial having been waived. Appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law (Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) are contained herein.
Plaintiff, Floyd Mullins, brings this cause under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and says that the defendants (police officers of the cities of Eeorse and River Rouge) deprived him of a constitutionally guaranteed right to medical treatment while jailed. He says that this deprivation resulted in the loss by him of all his fingers on both hands and portions of his thumbs.
On a very cold…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- William Whirl v. C. v. (Buster) Kern and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White v. RochfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Jones v. McElroyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Reed v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Smith v. HillDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
- Ferguson v. FleckDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.