Legal Opinion
Zadoff v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1986No. 82 Civ. 7160 (JES)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
This is an action for a federal tax refund. See Complaint at IIIV. Defendant has moved for summary judgment and the parties have stipulated to a set of facts for the purposes of this motion. For the reasons set forth infra, the Court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
The facts in this action, as set forth in the parties’ stipulation of facts (“Stipulation”) and the exhibits attached thereto, are as follows: From 1972-1974, the plaintiff Jerome Zadoff (“Zadoff”) was employed by the Milton Bradley Co. (“Bradley”) as a purchasing agent. See…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Smith v. Board of GovernorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gallo v. United States, Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Parks v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996