Legal Opinion

Di Mezzes v. Yellow Cab Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1960No. Appeal, No. 131Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Rita Di Mezzes filed a complaint in trespass against Albert Raditz and the Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, hereinafter referred to as the Company, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries caused by a motor vehicle collision. At the trial the Company *105moved for a compulsory nonsuit and also presented a point for binding instructions. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants. The Company’s motion for judgment n.o.v. was denied and judgment was entered upon the verdict. This appeal by the Company followed.

Miss Di Mezzes testified that, about 4:30 p.m.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hyndman v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Nebel v. BurrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Beatty v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Brown v. Shirks Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Bloom v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API